- Journal of Labor Economics (October 2018, vol. 36, no. 4)
- Abstract: Using 4 decades of variation in the federal and state Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), we estimate the impact of exposure to EITC expansions in childhood on education and employment outcomes in adulthood. Reduced-form results suggest that an additional $1,000 in EITC exposure when a child is 13–18 years old increases the likelihood of completing high school (1.3%), completing college (4.2%), and being employed as a young adult (1.0%) and earnings by 2.2%. Our analysis reveals that the primary channel through which the EITC improves these outcomes is increases in pretax family earnings.
- Ungated version here
- Media: Medium / Biden Forum
- American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, Revise and Resubmit
- Winner of the 2017 Outstanding Doctoral Dissertations in Government Finance and Taxation by the
National Tax Association
- Winner of the 2016 Michael J. Moore Dissertation Prize for Best Paper in Applied Microeconomics
- Presentations: 2018: IZA Workshop on Gender and Family Economics; 2017: New York University, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, U.S. Department of the Treasury, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; 2016: Society of Labor Economists, National Tax Association, Association for Public Policy Analysis & Management, Cleveland State University, University of Michigan, Economic History Association (poster), International Institute of Public Finance, Western Economic Association; 2015: Southern Economic Association, National Tax Association, Mannheim Tax Conference, Association for Public Policy Analysis & Management, Midwest Economic Association; 2014: University of Michigan H2D2 Research Conference (poster).
- Abstract: The rise of working mothers radically changed the U.S. economy and the role of women in society. In one of the first studies of the 1975 introduction of the Earned Income Tax Credit, I find that this program increased maternal employment by 6 percent, representing one million mothers and an elasticity of 0.49. The EITC may help explain why the U.S. has long had such a high fraction of working mothers despite few childcare subsidies or parental-leave policies. I also find evidence that this influx of working mothers affected social attitudes and led to higher approval of working women.
- Presentations: 2018: Society of Labor Economists, Research and Evaluation Conference on Self-Sufficiency; 2017: International Institute of Public Finance, National Tax Association
- Abstract: The EITC provides a ``marriage bonus'' to some couples but a ``marriage penalty'' to others: the average incentive is theoretically ambiguous, has changed over time, and existing empirical evidence has been mixed. The EITC also encourages some households to have more children but others to have less. Using over 30 years of household panel data, I find that federal and state EITC expansions increase marriage and fertility, and decrease non-marital cohabitation. These results imply that some estimates in the EITC literature may be biased, since endogenous switching from unmarried to married or increasing fertility would violate the stable-group-composition condition required by difference in differences.
WORK IN PROGRESS
“Does the EITC Pay for Itself? Evidence from Linked Administrative Data” with Maggie Jones
- Presentations: 2018: Columbia University, International Institute of Public Finance
“Public Policy and Time Spent Between Mothers and Children” with Lance Lochner
“Crowd Out or In? Domestic and International STEM Students” with Jeff Grogger and Gordon Hanson
“Time Use Among Full-Time Workers and the Gender Wage Gap” with Yana Gallen
“Does the EITC Help or Harm Rural America? Evidence from Migration” with Dan Black
“The Role of the Earned Income Tax Credit in the Narrowing of the Gender Wage Gap”
“How Much of the Gender and Racial Wage Gap Can Be Explained by Discriminatory Attitudes?”
“The 1964 Civil Rights Act and Black-White Outcomes: 50 Years Later”